Read an interesting article this week on “the perils and pleasures of long-running fantasy series” by Zack Handlen. The article seems to conclude, ultimately, that all very long, multi-volume epics are by design doomed to disappoint – and yet we love them anyway. It’s a difficult conclusion to reach.
Zack Handlen appears believes this happens because readers become attached to the characters in these stories – a true enough proposition. I know I’ve become strongly attached to characters in long-running series. The readers, Zack argues, are involved in an intimate “relationship” with the series that is ultimately “one sided”. With each successive volume, the epic fantasy author raises the stakes – and reader expectations – for the final volume, making his job increasingly difficult. Part of the problem, the article suggests, is that the once a book is published, it’s “set in stone”. The author can’t go back and tweak it, revise it, and refashion it. As the story changes in the telling, the details at the beginning of the series may no longer mesh with the reality that comes at the end. The series accumulates so many threads, some are left loose and other resolved unsatisfactorily for at least some readers.
However, I’m not sure I agree with the general thesis that all long-running epic fantasies necessarily lead to disappointment. Continue reading