In the previous post I began a discussion of a topic I’ve long wanted to address here on this blog: the concept of Mythopoeia as a distinct genre within the sphere of Speculative Fiction. However, I ended the first part of my discussion with what appears to be a fatal contradiction. I defined Mythpoeia as a work of constructed or artificial mythology, but then acceded that most works of modern Fantasy Fiction (and indeed many works of other subgenres of Speculative Fiction) are predicated on invented mythologies.¹ Still, I contend that there is a line of separation between a true work of Mythopoeia and a work of modern Fantasy Fiction.
Just what, then, is that line of separation? Consider this: I would assert that Tolkien’s “Lord of the Rings”, in fact, is not a work of Mythopoeia. It is, rather, an artifact of Tolkien’s Mythopoem. It is a physical manifestation, in book form, that attests to the existence of the underlying mythopoetic work. In other words, a novel, or a novel series, is not Mythopoeia. But a novel – frequently, but not always, a novel of Epic or High Fantasy – is typically the the primary mechanism by which the reading and media-consuming public will discover and interact with the Mythpoetic work.
It is my contention, therefore, that while many works of modern fantasy and science fiction include mythological motifs and invented backstories and mythologies, few writers and creators are creating Mythopoeia by design. Most of the imaginary mythologies and backstories exist solely in support of the fantasy novel to which they are attached, with little or no intrinsic value of their own, and with little of interest to explore outside the framework of the novel.
Take the Harry Potter novels, for instance. Continue reading