Skip to content

Daily Update and a “Birkman” Correction…

July 30, 2010

So, dear friends and regular readers, you’ll notice that there’s no story posted this morning for Friday Flash and the Author Aerobics.  It’s been quite the week here, but not in the normal way.  I got hit by a nasty virus – the digital kind, not the organic kind – first at home and then at work.  (Same one, incidentally, and several other people at work got hit by the same one.)  So that had me down-and-out, computer-wise for the past couple days.  Luckily I had finished writing the posts on using the Birkman as a writing tool over the past couple of weeks, so they were ready to go.  But whether I can get a story up today will depend on how the afternoon goes today – particularly around the lunchish time of day – now that I have a working computer again.

Speaking of those Birkman posts from earlier this week – I had a wonderful conversation with the folks at Birkman International yesterday, and I learned something regarding a part of the Birkman that I had expressed a little confusion over in those posts: specifically the “Action” score and how it relates to me.  I had expressed my feeling that I thought myAction score was too high – that I’m not impulsive by nature.  And it’s true that I’m not.  But after discussing this with the friendly people at Birkman, I realized that my “Needs” score on Action was very low – implying that I “Need” opportunities to reflect and plan before springing into action.  But, once I have a plan, I want to go and just do it, I don’t want to waste time.  The explanation hit home with this anecdote: “It’s like, when I go to the store, I’d rather park in a parking space farther away from the door and walk there than just drive around waiting for a closer spot.”  Bingo.  That’s me to a tee, for certain.  I do that all the time.  Basically, it suggests that I already have a “plan” to go to the store.  So, my “needs” are met, and now it’s time to do something about it.   Honestly, I hadn’t thought of it in that way, but with that helpful explanation, it’s a bit clearer to me, now, so I thought I should pass that on, lest I leave the same confusion with any of my readers here.  (To read my series on the Birkman, here is Part 1, and here is Part 2.)

Well, now I return you to your regularly-scheduled blogging.  Maybe I’ll even have a story for you all, later!

7 Comments leave one →
  1. July 30, 2010 11:56 am

    Glad you’re back up Stephen! That virus taken care of?

    I like that. I think I’m a low-action type as well. And once I have a plan, I sit on it some more. A.K.A. a procrastinator!!! 🙂

    • July 30, 2010 12:02 pm

      Yeah, I’m on a brand new machine at work, and home (where I have full admin rights, natch) is cleaned up. So… I’m mostly back in business… except for the still not having time thing. 😉

  2. July 30, 2010 12:33 pm

    Ironically, I was hit by a physical virus this week and I’m still sniffling at my desk right now. You know, I’m not sure which kind of virus I’d rather deal with. Hmm!


  1. Friday Flash: Bright Hands « The Undiscovered Author
  2. Personality Tests: “Birkman” for Writers (Part 1) « The Undiscovered Author
  3. Personality Tests: “Birkman” for Writers (Part 2) « The Undiscovered Author

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: